Label clouds logic

I was looking for a way to do some more with labels and I like the way I can find something with the cloud and perhaps it helps a visitor to know that most of what I post is simply about programming in one form or another. I pasted this in the URL of my Firefox browser and it worked to find that label.

http://infinitefuture.blogspot.com/search/label/programming?max-results=1
or
http://infinitefuture.blogspot.com/search/label/AI?max-results=10

Now I need a way to search several as logical sets and I don't think I can unless I use google direct or with an interface so I will analyze that . Strange that I can just paste that as a url and get a set limit of posts. I am sure the API will let me find what I want. I will post the results when I solve the process.

When I have my own server running I will fix all this and use a server side script to make an N-dimensional relationship of the data. Yes, trees, matrix, hash and linked lists. I found a way to do the logic myself when I type, but that is too time intensive, I need a program to do the work for me and I don't have the patience to do it by hand through Google, so I will start fresh with my own domain.

I see that every post I ever made on any blog, XKCD , PodBlack, or Slashdot is indexed on the web. Well my silliness will live on as long as they backup the Internet. I think I will download the Internet and save it on my USB drive, just in case. It is bizarre when they start indexing the list of indexes. It seems that somebody should be careful about recursing the Internet, it could happen and then everybody would say, "Hey I was using that!" That isn't a joke. I understand the process and it is possible to find oneself in a big pickle fairly easy by just typing the wrong reference into some code. I don't want to think about it, it is too complex and it will give me a headache if I try to solve whether it is possible to make a piece of code that causes all the nets to recurse. I will not think about it. End of topic, no more analysis of multiple [or-and] search in search. "Please don't forsake me oh my darling", "High Noon", "Please don't recurse me oh my Internet", from "The Internet".

Now that I started thinking about it I can't stop, because it seems that I remember somebody who looked at email and said, "Hey this will send one email and then that will send 2 or maybe 7" and it was the first "worm". It is a thing that never existed before, 'The Intertubes' and there is no basis to define how it will act under an intentional mis-direction. I won't be as silly as the person who did that. I would never try such a thing. Looking at the "Morris Worm" partial quote from Wikipedia at the link.

The U.S. GAO put the cost of the damage at $10M–100M.
The Morris worm prompted DARPA to fund the establishment of the CERT
Robert Morris was tried and convicted.

It is giving me a headache already as it branches to infinity so quickly. ((10⁹)!) * (3*10⁸ meters per second) , ten to the ninth factorial times the speed of light, definitely a spooky number! Let's hope it doesn't follow Murphy's law.

ADDED: So I thought, "How does this work?" I can guess that if you want to show something the default is 'index.html' and I figured it couldn't be that easy. If it were that easy, I could use some command to get it and then get another one and make a two dictionaries in python ( post titles), check where list A intersected with list B [ I posted code for this in Python as factorial search of combined letters in words for scrabble in a dictionary ].

wget http://infinitefuture.blogspot.com/search/label/C/index.html

So I tried it. And to my surprise it gave me all the items in that category as "index.html". Thus the factorial recombination and analysis to allow me to and-or group and define a complex search space is simple from there. Now where does this apply also? I remember a talk on "Data Typing" or some such thing at Google Talks and this is what they mean, a general algorithm that is applicable to many data sets. Data mining. I see many things when I encounter something and it is a storm and there in the distant clouds of complexity is the corner case of darkness. The swan appears quite dark from here.

I have done this several times as I wished to automate the process of data analysis for several purposes including the care and feeding of my hungry young AIs. [class='timestamp-link' href=] is the key and after that is the data, it is as simple as FILE file;file=fopen("index.html","rb");, and scan to the key and then take to the end, which is then stripped like a method similar to `basename` in shell. Simple stuff actually.

It is too simple, actually. The convenience has made everything a limited guessable set. It is so predictable, I can almost hear the electrons sloshing around in the intertubes. It is the heavy electrons that make the most noise. And at least technically that is true. m₀@0v  not =  m@v etc.

The oddest thing I saw was that Googly the server-cat was doubling up stuff and it doesn't show up in my template. It is overlaying several identical images and you would never know that because it disappears before Firefox-Firebug can get to it. I would never have guessed that. The Inter-tubes are awfully squeaky and sometimes makes scary noises.

Python twist demon exorcism

For the sake of reference this is how I found a missing function for python using `apt-cache search` .

import feedparser
from twisted.application import service, strports
from nevow import appserver, loaders, static, rend
from nevow import tags as T

motey@motey-desktop:~$ sudo apt-cache search feedparser

Returned this:

python-feedparser - Universal Feed Parser for Python

sudo apt-get install python-nevow \
python-twisted-web \
python-feedparser \
apache2

twistd -noy twist.tac
http://localhost:8081/

strports.service("8081"

This is to take another pass at the twisted framework and looking into Python implementation in some more detail. I have gone through STAN and twisted methods and how they are applied in Python and have a general handle on the associative process. I don't have a full understanding of that yet and so it will another pass tomorrow. It works, I can pull feeds to analyze. I think the next step is to create a KDE desktop widget for my personal amusement that does some OpenGL and blender model rendering. I understand more and yet there is so much more to know. Yes, a WebGL widget.

Testing SOAP to see if it is clean

I am starting with a GTK and mono example here. The post will fill out in real time as I test each element and discover hidden truths, which ultimately should allow me to see if Google SOAP-spell likes Wikipedia.

So it is another cliff and maybe I won't hit as hard this time. I am like Wily Coyote, I get squashed and come right back to jump again. So I start with a refresher in Glade and on to the localhost implementation of SOAP.

#File: gui.glade
<?xml version="1.0" standalone="no"?> <!--*- mode: xml -*-->
<!DOCTYPE glade-interface SYSTEM "http://glade.gnome.org/glade-2.0.dtd">
<glade-interface>

I didn't like that example as it is too "Windowzy" and I select this: gSOAP with C next to test.

This sequence is going to drop as I have done SOAP, Glade, mono, C# and all this stuff before and I have no immediate need for the information and I am going to drop it as boring. I don't care that much if Google likes Wiki or not. and it seems they use SOAP a lot but also REST on blogger and so the results might be indeterminate and I hate that.

╒═════╕
│  ☺  │
╘═════╛

WebTL

WebGL logo is provided as information and links to the official site. The image is served from their site and would change based on their representation of themselves. That is the best I can do to represent their intent in having a standard image and assocation.

WebGL is something I am studying and I need to spend some more time with it to understand the protocol. I think it would be possible to make my own program enhancements to WebTL, which added a transport mechanism to communicate thought like concepts. To define a framework and options that allows the AI to communicate a concept method that was perhaps just a program construction template to begin with. I will add what I discover about WebGL here. WebGL at Wikipedia. WebGL at youtube. WebGL tutorials based on NeHe openGL. I have tested with build 12-30-2009 of MineField and it got farther with a triangle, but still no complete process. I guess this is all very new. I will have to see what the insides of the java look like. I am also wondering if it is possible to have "WebAL" which would allow sound to be integrated with OpenGL using something like espeak. I could get a vector file, animation script and voice match timing. I think it is possible to integrate all that as a complete pseudo world like interface. I know I can just go to one of the VR worlds, but the communication based on a higher level of abstraction ( with lower data rates ) is what interests me.

I also noticed something in Opera and here is a blog reference to using SVG animation with Opera?

Firefox WebGL

I was playing with Firefox nightly and Web GL and that is interesting and worth a tour. WebGL could be the future of the web, it certainly looks very interesting. It is a riot and so edgy!

./firefox -P DangerMouse -no-remote &

Video download methods, down and out

This requires a build from source, but I would guess it will be in Debian soon, if they can get the name conflicts resolved and test if "clive" and "clive" will conflict. Video download at Sourceforge

I wanted to watch some new educational videos that showed up on youtube recently and tried out my clive command line utility and it did not work. I had written some scripts to extract videos from XML and HTML, and created scripts to get them so I could view them and study them until I grasped the concepts.

I don't want to host or share or even keep a gazillion terabytes of video, but I like to pause, study, and move about in the lectures to see if I missed something. So it is very inconvenient and almost impossibly frustrating to do that with flash.

So... here is the story as it happened to me today.

First I looked at the source and manual for clive and tried some options that failed horribly. Normally I would assume that my skills were weak and that is why it doesn't work, but NO the code is squirrelly. I got the source and it was Python, which I walked through and was not impressed.

So I looked to the net to find something better and the link at the top of the page is an answer for anybody interested. It is a C++ code implementation and works, as I tested it. It has "abby" also which is a GUI interface so it can be used by mere humans. I would be sad that I spent so much time developing a good link extractor, but it was great practical coding training and experience. abby has a built in video link extraction method so you can get several videos off a page. This is what I do, I get enough of a course that I can skip around and find out what I didn't already learn and then dump them to the bottomless pit of /dev/null when I have grasped the content.

I was studying CPAN and ASP and AJAX yesterday and finished with that.

I then went into Cantor, Leibniz, Turing, Kurt Gödel, and infinities. It is my cultured opinion that they suck at infinity and dimensional understanding. I am sorry, but the Halting problem is not very elegant at all and is hardly a super duper concept. There is something beyond infinities, and there are some things that I know about that, which I will keep to myself, for now. I read Cantor many years ago and he mainly had a problem with something that should be very obvious to anybody that actually grasps what the infinities imply. It is dangerous to some kinds of minds and that is another issue, as it is sometimes not possible to understand a subject from within the subject itself and that has nothing to do with the set of all sets, incompleteness, halting or Hilbert's Hotel.

P may not equal NP, but the elements that should be included in each is certainly not the same for me and others. It is actually very sad that much knowledge must die in each generation with many great minds and perhaps some day that will be solved. It is certainly a great entropic leak, at least.

Actually I am studying OWL, GGG, ontologies, and associated concepts like web spider traps, NOP slides, infinitely recursive associations in net space, and dealing with ontological relationships of things in n-dimensional-space.

Also Sprach moteyalpha, or maybe Zarathustra. A riddle in notes of the scale.

Schizophrenic Relativity

This is the point I am hoping to merge the idea of locality and non-locality in a consistent framework that resolves some of the topological confusion in the higher dimensions.

The reason for the name of the post is that when I look at an equation represented as the projection of space on an axis, I am seeing the symbolic mathematical system look at the projection of the n-dimensional reality of the materials involved.

There is no reason that a person that has a curiosity about the universe should not find everything they need , somewhere on the web.

If there is an EPR ( Einstein Podolsky Rosen ) bridge, I suspect I may find it here. I doubt it is there, however many things that I have considered impossible have become real and though anecdotal evidence is hardly a good rule it does confirm that I am not always right in my projections of what might be possible. It is always fun to try, anyway.

As complex and difficult as some of the symbols of math and logic can be, it actually suffers from too much overlap in symbols. The context switch from different sciences can be almost a schizophrenic adventure itself. In this case the symbols like partial differential operators mixed with differentials can be as much of a challenge as the science itself. In this case I might suspect that ^ was shorthand for the xor operator at first glance. Obviously they do not program in C or they would have chosen some other symbol. I don't think that using α β and γ instead of a b c adds anything more than making it look more foreign. I have written single line shell scripts that are more complex than the functional interrelationships themselves. If you have done openGL, the name set and the relationship to concepts can be daunting. Well at least they don't do the equations in 'comic sans serif'.

I had a really strange thought as I pondered the concept and realized there is one way that an object could go through a black hole if the structure is as is described. I have my doubts about the specifics of the mechanics of a black hole and its relationship to time and dimension, but that means that I (as well) don't know for sure either.

ADDED: Well, there I go again, I thought of an experiment to do ( if only I had a black hole to play with ) then I realized that if the experiment worked, that the signs of the effect would show up around black holes. Now if only there were some data on black holes that I could look through to check that, oh yeah, its on the web. I have to be comfortable with the math before I analyze the data, but is an intriguing idea that seems to be at least plausible.

ADDED MORE: It appears that there is a relationship that implies that time travel is possible, however the process would never be like the popularized idea of time which means that paradox ensues or that something can derive from nothing. The conservation of energy, momentum, matter, and thus, all consequence are conserved. It does allow for some very unusual conditions that allow things that would seem to be paradoxical, but would not be. If I had a method to travel all over the universe and collect technology from millions of advanced cultures and returned here, I would not need to have a sequence of development or precursor, only that a precursor does exist at some point in space.

The solution to some problems arise by assuming a solution and then working backward. This is not paradoxical and the way I derived GCF in a program is an example of this, as is the derivation of f'(a^x)Δx with some methods.

Some of what I achieve is singularity like in that I use the external electronic structure of the world as an extension of my mind. I cannot look through 100 trillion web pages and find something I need, but I can leverage the internet to do that. Between the elvi and my programming methods, I can make an effective filter that solves for a need or piece that extends my solutions. WolframAlpha is, in a way, an attempt to implement this as an object that is easy to use. It is presently limited to mathematic concepts, however they all end in the same place as Δx goes to to zero.

The interaction of all the information available as filtered by reasonable AI becomes something that cannot exist by itself. If the information and method to access that is removed, then I am damaged. In the same way, if I did not provide answers to others, they also would be limited.

There comes a point where people cannot even function without their Google eyes.

P2P Google

It seems that an open source network of P2P machines could do just as well as Google in indexing and ordering search data. The structure as a whole is that I can point at a location on the Internet and send something there, or get something there just like memory. In addition the nodes of memory in that structure are all computational. Many sorts act in a parallel fashion and the algorithms can be selected to be used in this way.

In this way the Internet indexes itself, if it has a way to store and retrieve.

I will make a simple case of this. If a series of machines are connected in a circle that is partitioned in the letters a-z and the address of a, b, c,...z nodes are stored in a known location. I am a site called 'a', I look up the index and find the node a, and then I send it across the circle to that node. Alternately if all participate, the data is ordered by the circular connections and their sub connections. I really only need to know the index point and I can search anything I want.

Since each element is able to find its place in the list, there is no computation center at all. If I keep a list of blogs I read, then I am in a way doing the same thing. You might think that it would be abused, and most certainly it would, as is Google. I can do evil things to Google and they can respond, however the net result is the same whether there is A or B, people will be what they are and some are malicious and some are not. The predominant mode seems to be toward rationality and cooperation.

The result of this is that I can find anything on the Internet in log₂ time and this means that even 2³³³ ( a googol 10¹⁰⁰) takes 333 steps to find exactly what you need out of 10¹⁰⁰ things and I am guessing that would usually cover about anything that is, was, and will be for some time to come.

In a way, Wikipedia and others are already doing this, but they have not agreed on a method to establish the hierarchy of search and it really only requires a decision to do so and all the power and revenue of an international search system will be owned by those who participate.

There is no question that I can establish a linked list or tree or a dozen associative methods across the Internet. A linked list is just the address of the next element and is pointed to by the previous element. How much CPU time would it consume for me to allocate one variable on my machine as the 'next' IP xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx; the answer is 4 bytes per machine. The trees and indexes could be arranged to solve equations and some presently intractable problems .

Wikipedia is building an indexed structure to knowledge, which is commendable and in its completion, it may become the new place to search for information, instead of the randomness of unstructured search, which yields many more non-informational things than informational at times. The editors at Wikipedia are doing a great service to humanity and humanity could do a great service for itself, if it simply agreed to become self indexed.

The result of all this is that advertisers who pay to represent their context can place that information where it will be useful and not waste their time trying to screw with every single sole ( pun coming ) to sell shoes. The degree of indexing and specificity could be hundreds of times more effective by marking the data by specific qualities, like new old, cheap, expensive, high quality, quick delivery, slow and it would not be possible for the person selling something to manipulate the truth if they had no way to control a composite framework. In order to do that, they would have to class themselves as internet criminals or defacers.

The elvi want to dream of new organisms

Some might complain that I post too much, but if I commented on every topic that I study each day it would be hundreds of pages and I would not get much done. I see a correlation between AI and the availability of data and the ability to collect that data and transform it into a format that can be absorbed and utilized. The prerequisite knowledge of a specific subject or concept is much like the library requirements of a software package that needs to be linked and instantiated to complete the compilation.

The Theta θ analysis of algorithms is interesting in the fact that it touches on the concept in a way. The way I see it is that many techniques can be integrated at higher levels. It is much like ∫∫∫ of information or even δδδ of some situations.

I do think that there will be a limit to what I can absorb each day, but I have not hit that limit yet. I need to integrate the new understanding of creating life from non-life as a method which allows the exponentiation of effect of creation in physicality in the same way that I exponentiate and factorially ( which is a real word, missing from the spell checker) expand my effect with programming and programs.

Each time I learn something, it gets created into my programs and integrated so that it can be used and accessed. It serves as a shorthand access to the tools and I need not deal with the detail, except once so that it is managed properly and accounts for its object interface and usage methods.Many of these things are familiar to me, however they were not named, just created by need. I have devised asymptotic analysis, however I speak of it as how quickly a function 'branches to infinity'. It makes it much easier to understand many concepts, as I have already devised them independently, and this gets back to the autodidacts issue.