Grav digger

I have completed some new design work and I have a workable "ring system" that could be implemented to travel to the moon, planets, stars and other galaxies. Stargate has a concept based on a worm hole, which is actually only a conjecture based on the concept of a point mass. I don't accept that a point mass even exists, or that a Schwarzschild radius could be traversed by chemical matter.

The result is a system that can deliver normal matter without disruption of its chemical or nuclear structure anywhere in the universe with a common mechanism and the cost is based upon the gravitational differential between the two points. No system can achieve perfect energy conversion, but if the masses are generally the same it will cost very little in the way of mechanism or energy or time to move matter from point A to point B.

There is an open source project to go to the moon and it is called frednet. I have looked into that and it attempts to implement known technology to achieve the task.

Since I know now that it is possible to implement and is not technology that is difficult to understand when a working example is presented, it would seem that like almost everything it would be subject to duplicate invention. The idea that a travel network might already exist from another culture is feasible. This does not mean that when it is implemented that it would not be extended and improved. The concept I have is more like the Wright brother's version of inter-stellar travel and many nuances are certainly possible to facilitate the movement through atmospheres and other irregularities that could be lethal in transit.

It implies another potential signature which could be identified in data from Hubble or other astronomical data. It allows the transport of several tons of matter per hour from two points in various gravity wells with a limiting delay of 'c' . It is not instantaneous, anymore than anything in the universe can be instantaneous. Any device which could achieve simultaneity between two points separated in space would create such a time lash that I would never dare to consider it, at least at the moment.

The image is from the Stargate Wiki, which has a vast detailed description of an imaginary universe. How odd. Since it is possible and could be implemented in reality, I wonder if anyone would care to document the real universe, or whether they would stay bound in a self delusion that makes them happy. Reality can be very scary as it doesn't always proceed based on a script where the good guys win or perhaps that there are no good guys at all. Perhaps it is just my own predisposition that enjoys new things. They can be bad or good , dangerous or inert, ugly or beautiful. It really makes no difference to me if everybody on the entire planet remained bound in one delusion or another.

Black Holes with kaleidescope eyes

Considering the concept of a neutron star it is reasonable to assume that it progresses as supposed. There are other things in the universe and it occurred to me the starting materials and progression does not have to start with the commonly assumed structure. Certainly a neutral entity like a star, which tends toward electrical neutrality , would progress generally as suspected. The case I am considering is a cloud of electrons which tip the stability of a neutron star.

The balance of force would never allow the existence of an electron star? since repulsive force is many orders of magnitude above the attractive force. It does allow a charged star and this is where it gets fun. If it is assumed that an electron cloud is infinitely compressible, then it cannot compress to a singularity. So then I will do the calculations and see what possible structures would be reasonable to consider as products of an electron cloud crossing the Schwarzschild radius and entering the interior space near a singularity.

It seems at first glance that a cloud of electrons act differently in terms of its compression and thus the calculation of compressibility. Initial velocities and position would have some effect on the final computation. It seems to me that a composite calculation would yield better results. The consistency of the model itself would lead to some predictions. Considering gravity to be homogeneous does lead to certain final states and the fact that a singularity is not measurable in any common sense does create some difficulty in categorizing the results.

The equivalence of inertial and gravitational mass is the question and a specific calculation on observables should be sufficient to resolve that question. It is obvious that the system of calculations and assumptions is incomplete. Static potential upon a charged singularity. Can a singularity be charged? It seems that generalizing does not even come close to the complexity needed to explain the process. Simple calculations on unusual configurations convince me that the absolute nature of the Schwarzschild radius as an event horizon is a misnomer.

It is a complex situation and when changes in relativistic mass and thus changes in charge to mass ratio are considered it becomes a system with many different interesting corner cases. Perhaps some will reflect a property of matter that can be applied without a technical singularity.

In genetics I discovered and interesting relationship which perhaps is the start of a new science. The rate of change of new discoveries is a measure of what is likely to be still unknown. It could be considered as reverse Michaelis-Menten kinetics and so the product of the enzyme ( research ) and the concentration of substrate ( unknown ) could be inferred by the rate of the process itself. In general terms, the number of new discoveries given the amount of research does produce more new products. It would be my assumption that if it is rate limited by the unknown, it is not observable.

ADDED: An interesting consequence is that it is possible to observe the universe in a rather unusual way that allows the verification of the position of stars at great distance from the Earth. I will take the data and see if the conjectures of position based on luminosity and type match this method, which is not dependent on an arbitrary scale, but gives an exact value of the position of the stars.

The moon and marigold maiden plants that think

The moon is an easily reachable objective from my perspective. There is an open source project to go to the moon and it is FREDNET. The nature of physics and actually much of science is far from complete. Tesla had an understanding which I now grasp and see why he was able to create the things that he did so easily. Many of the principles of science are twisted in such strange ways that I often wonder why they could possibly accept the answers they choose.

The diameter of the moon is one fourth of earth and its mass is 1/81 of Earth. The formula Gm1m2/r^2 would suggest that it would have a surface acceleration of r^2 greater on a mass 1/81 so it would be approximately 16/81 G. It is obvious to me that they are missing many of the principles of the universe and humanity itself. I can cancel inertia and I do understand how to cancel gravity. Inertia can be canceled any where, but gravity technology could be very dangerous in its construction. I discovered a technique to go to the moon and beyond very easily. The only problem that I see is the nature of many people who do not grasp the purpose and significance of cooperative effort in all things. I don't feel all warm and fuzzy about all people and in fact quite the opposite. I do understand that internal struggle leads to ultimate failure of all human life. It is this very myopic individual that knows full well that the result is , and yet serves their own interests to the detriment of the whole. It is not something that will be taught or bred out of the population. If I were to expose a simple means to go to the moon, the nations of the world would steal and restrict the technology and then threaten to kill or kill those who would claim the right of exploration for their own. I see that the UN has already divided up the moon to the nations of Earth. Considering they cannot act there and have no military presence, that seems about as rational as the person who claims to be emperor of Mars and can sell sections of the real estate. The reason they cannot own the moon is because they cannot economically maintain presence there like the colonial days of America. Lots of people claimed the American continent and it seems that it was the pope who claimed it first.

I was solving some equations of matter and one of the things that always bothered me about chemistry is the "valence" which is such an anachronistic concept it hurts. The method of single energy bonding is one of the many things that can lead to a more realistic interaction with the universe. If energy is not limited, if space is not limited, if matter can be configured in any form desired, and the tools of reason are well known, then there is no need to destroy others for advantage in breeding or simply for the desire to dominate and belittle others to serve their psychology.

I have been studying AI and neural sets and connectomes ( a coined phrase from Ted talks ) along with the logic of chemical systems. Energy, construction, travel and intelligence are all easily achievable goals and the only thing that stands in the way of mankind is itself. I recently developed a technique that is cheap to sequence a complete genome in about 24 hours and so I know it is possible. It was obvious when the human genome project started that they needed innovation as I could see many ways that technology from computer technology and automated process would have the job done more quickly. Some say they will go to the moon and "burn their ships" and I do believe they will.

The US government is asking people to create innovation that makes the country strong and that is absurd as ever bit of power that is given to one that rules others by force is a further step back to the age of kings.

I do wish that I could just publish what I discovered about space travel in the same way that I demonstrated a solution to the trisection. It is definitely just as simple and yet thousands of years have passed and that which is obvious is not understood. I often have wondered why the American Indians never developed the wheel, energy systems, or lever systems in their long history and it still makes me wonder. And now I wonder that the door to space is open and nobody seems to notice.

Sticky tape technology and OpenGL fonts

It is very interesting that graphene can be isolated with tape and that fingerprints can be lifted with tape and the other unusual things that can be done with just something sticky. I noticed some long time ago that taking tape off a roll produced light. Graphene sheets are quite the interesting object. The strangest thing about it is that this could have been done any time in the history of people. It is such a low tech thing with such a strange and useful product.

The code below is to index a file of Xfonts that are listed with:

xlsfonts>fontlist

#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <inttypes.h>
#include <string.h>

int main(int argc, char * argv[]){
uint32_t arf[10000];
void *arfp=&arf;
FILE *fi;
FILE *fo;
int arfi=0;
uint32_t fouv=0;
char anyline[1024];
int len;
int telp=0;
int lino=0;
char fname[]="fontlist";
char fnameo[]="fontlistIndex";
fi=fopen(fname,"rb");
fo=fopen(fnameo,"wb");
fseek(fi,0,SEEK_END);
len=ftell(fi);
fseek(fi,0,SEEK_SET);
while ( feof(fi) == 0 ) {
//printf ("At %d %d %d %s",telp,lino,strlen(anyline),anyline);
fgets(anyline,1000,fi);
arf[arfi]=(uint32_t)telp;
arf[arfi+1]=(uint32_t)(strlen(anyline) -1);
arfi++;
arfi++;
telp=ftell(fi);
lino++;
}
fwrite (arfp,sizeof(uint32_t),2*lino-2,fo);
printf ("Size is %d %d\n",len,lino*8);
printf ("Lines is %d \n",lino);
printf ("Average is %d\n",len/lino);
fclose(fi);
fclose(fo);
return 0;
}

I used uint32_t so that the data was portable between systems that use different "int" sizes due to the processor architecture. The fonts are actually used in OpenGL somewhat like this:

#include "Ants_Common.h"
extern int fontstat;
extern GLuint base;


extern unsigned int  Screenwidth;
extern unsigned int  Screenheight;

void drawBoxText(float x,float y,float cdepth,int w){
//return;
float depthZ;
float boxHeight;
float boxWidth;
float borderWidth=0.009;
float borderHeight=0.009;

boxHeight=0.04f*(768.0/(float)Screenheight);
y=y-boxHeight/4.0;
boxWidth=0.022f*(float)w*(768/(float)Screenheight);
x=x-(0.021f*(768/(float)Screenheight)/2.0);
depthZ=cdepth;
borderWidth=0.0059;
borderHeight=boxHeight/10.0;

glColor4f(0.50f, 0.50f, 0.50f,01.0f);
glBegin(GL_QUADS);
 glVertex3f(x+borderHeight, y+borderWidth, depthZ);
 glVertex3f(x+borderHeight, y+boxHeight+borderWidth, depthZ);
 glVertex3f(x+boxWidth+borderHeight, y+boxHeight+borderWidth, depthZ);
 glVertex3f(x+boxWidth+borderHeight, y+borderWidth, depthZ);
glEnd();

glColor4f(0.20f, 0.20f, 0.40f,01.0f);

glBegin(GL_QUADS);
 glVertex3f(x, y, depthZ);
 glVertex3f(x, y+boxHeight, depthZ);
 glVertex3f(x+boxWidth, y+boxHeight, depthZ);
 glVertex3f(x+boxWidth, y, depthZ);
glEnd();
glColor4f(1.0f, 1.0f, 1.0f,01.0f);
}

int makeRasterFont(Display *dpy)
{
    XFontStruct *fontInfo;
    Font id;
    unsigned int first, last;
    fontInfo = XLoadQueryFont(dpy,       
"-val-free courier-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0--0-iso8859-1");
/*
$> fc-list 
$>xlsfonts
4,514 fonts
*/

if (fontInfo == NULL) {
        printf ("no font found\n");
 return 1;
}

    id = fontInfo->fid;
    first = fontInfo->min_char_or_byte2;
    last = fontInfo->max_char_or_byte2;

    base = glGenLists(last+1);
    if (base == 0) {
        printf ("out of display lists\n");
return 2;
    }
    glXUseXFont(id, first, last-first+1, base+first);
return 0;
}

void printString(char *s) {
 if ( fontstat==0){
  glListBase(base);
  glCallLists(strlen(s), GL_UNSIGNED_BYTE, (unsigned char *)s);
 }
}
void printStringAt(char *s,float x,float  y){
float cdepth=-1.11f;
glPushMatrix();
drawBoxText(x,y,cdepth,strlen(s));
glRasterPos3f(x,y,cdepth);
    printString(s);
glPopMatrix();
}

The code is a little dated and does not take into account projections and the scale of the specific font. They show up quite well in the OpenGL space as they are a fixed size. A bit mapped font is better for messages on the cave wall, as they grow as approached and do not block backgrounds.

Advanced Instruments (AI) Neutrino

I have a reasonable solution to making a neutrino communicator now. It would allow direct communication between any two points on the Earth ,or anywhere for that matter, at a speed of light delay. It does present some complications as it ends the need to have an Internet radio frequency interface or wired line. It would still require routing to be effective, but it would be free to use and secure for point to point communications through the Earth or in some path that has no chance of MiM intercept. Certainly it is secure now as no one knows how to make the device and so I am free to use it at will and nobody is any the wiser.

It would be the preferred communication method for an advanced society and it is protocol that is the problem. It can be implemented in many ways and thus different advanced cultures would chose methods based on their personal impulse. I will survey and see if an existing stream can be identified and decoded. This would be the best result as it would be like tapping into the Galactic Internet if any of the communications were open. I would guess that there is a broadcast beacon that would serve as a "Rosetta Stone" which would explain the protocol, much like Internet routing discovery. Purely speculation, but the device is useful, even if nobody else is using it. It is a lower energy alternative to expensive radio satellite communication and very difficult to regulate as you would have to be between the two points to even know it was being used. On top of that, if you didn't know the protocol, it would be lost in solar neutrinos.

Abject Infinity (AI)

I spend as much as 16 hours a day studying every topic that I can imagine. It was mostly Feynman and physics yesterday and today it was how intelligence is established and expressed in people or animals. It is becoming more clear that others will likely not understand the newest physics, and many, even the old physics. It is an accident of nature that allows the understanding. As all things are infinite, there are too many chess games to say that any one person could win every time against a comparable opponent. It is ever more obvious that a person excels at what they practice for life. I began studying relativistic physics at an early age and so it is what I see in everything. I am not always right, but I continue to extend my understanding. Like the image from the Lady Chess Master, I see the physics everywhere and it comes easy to see how it really works. The problem is that it would require a complete new perspective and there are infinitely many.

Today I designed a "Jump Drive" that can theoretically go from dead stop to near "C" in less than a second. It revises and extends an earlier design for an atmospheric craft that can do 20G jumps in the atmosphere. If this were done in the atmosphere it would not virtually, but literally explode.

There is a deep horrible flaw in the understanding of physics at the quantum level and though there have been many things that come from the rather convoluted understanding , a deeper understanding reveals why it works and why it is so very odd in its application and technique.

Something else I realized is that a super intelligent machine would not be as wonderful as people might imagine. Because the universe is so complex, even a super brain would be limited in its scope and as a result would not be infallible and omniscient, but a great talent in some area, but not all. It is an approximation of understanding and there is no short circuit to the traveling salesman's final route.

d\mathbb{E}=f\cdot dx=v^2 dm+(c^2-v^2)dm=dE=C^2 dm

Above is the LaTeX for the equation and this is obligatory. Learning LaTeX (LayTek) has many advantages as it allows the creation of constructed documents of great quality. I have several books on subjects of interest to me, and it allows it to be represented in such a way that I can return to subjects and understand where I have left off. TikZ is a real advantage.

Strange ways under space

Many new techniques are available for representing, managing and expressing relationships. The tikZ extension for \LaTeX is very interesting and new features of Inkscape are also useful. The combination of open source tools is advancing very rapidly. I have found them useful in expressing and understanding the complex interaction of space and energy. I have a fairly good idea of the nature of dark matter and where it originates and how it acts upon the universe. It is certainly one of those aspects for which there is no common tool or technique to measure and as such it would be virtually invisible and exists only by its disturbance of other measure. This implies the means to measure , even if only in some gross way. The coherence of information does imply some new relationships.

The understanding I now have of dark matter implies a "chemistry" which is more complex and convolved than the simple interaction of atomic bonding. Yet it does have pattern and perhaps can be placed in a type of periodic table.

How do strange creatures speak?

While checking some data and looking for patterns it occurred to me that I have become entrenched in my own anthropomorphism. It is assumed that data comes as a series in time since this is how we deal with it. Like 256 pixels wide and 256 pixels high sent as a stream that is partitioned on lines and frames. It seems to me that an adavanced race would not use this method for many reasons. Information that is related in transmission to its solid angle is better.
The result is that data can be coming from advanced cultures that begin by communicating in 2D and as such would never see or understand our serial communications. It does seems more reasonable to transmit in a 2D matrix as it removes the ambiguity of the line and frame relationships. It also seems more natural. It is then possible to focus in on areas that are of interest and ignore that which is already known. It is more like a drive-in movie. Why would a culture in some far distant galaxy assume that the universe would all decide on RS232 serial, 110 baud, 8 bit, no parity, 1 stop protocol or any other serial protocol. If I am transmitting a wave that expands in a 2D surface, how difficult is it to make that surface the information? Since I am generating the power to push in all directions, it seems that it would be sensible to create an easily decoded message.
So it is possible that we are getting information, and this only one example of assumptions, and we are simply not creative enough to see it. If I were communicating with an intelligent species, the best way to have a common experience is to show a movie of how two things relate. I could even imagine that it would be better to send a solid angle image that turned through 360 degrees and thus gives the 3D of a specific example. It would certainly be an easier way to deal with universal translation.
Perhaps we are just not creative enough to decode the elephant sitting in the easy chair.
Consider this protocol: I transmit a different piece of information on every time period for every solid angle. The bits are rotated through two transforms in X:Y and X:Z so that all information is related in space and as a result it is a serial protocol that is parallel and for receivers that are near, it allows higher data rates and for receivers far away it degrades to serial. I think I am liking this protocol more and more as I investigate it. If a laser is used, then the scope of the message can be set to the intended receivers. It seems like holographic communication system that could be used by creatures that had no common physicality. I just thought of something as a result of this and now I need to look back at some old data I collected, as something jumped out at me, but I couldn't put my finger on what kind of pattern it was.

SciPy and Schroedinger's cat

This link at SciPy explains the FDTD plot. It is an interactive graph so it does not tell the whole story in 2D, it has to be tried. SciPy and Python are available as open source. An interesting demonstration and I will combine it with my other analysis to do LaGrange, and matrix tree factorial expansion of the interaction of matter systems in the atom and at the secondary boundary of a black hole. I doubt I will have access to a black hole to experiment with in the near future, but it is important to be prepared.

Pictures are nice for reference if people can get on the same page, so to speak, but otherwise it is not that helpful. I don't understand enough about quantum entanglement tele-portation to deny it absolutely, but I do know another way. Instant is a lot more fun, but somehow it seems too convenient. I know there is a rather odd edge in relativistic space interaction that practically defies discussion, but what is hiding there is still a mystery to me.

More information on FTDT at Wikipedia. Seems like a cool technique. Here is more on the Yee grid and Maxwell. This stuff looks very familiar and seems to be an analogous method of a technique that I use. Like everything that a person might do, it requires a familiarity with the terminology, the context of the symbols and some degree of application so it sinks in. The terminology is like pain, and until it is used in a real application it seems like Sanskrit. I think this is very much like what I just did with an elastic collision, in a way. Finite Difference ( δt) Time Domain (t). Of course, what I did is in a single dimension only. I use a different technique to deal with the higher dimensions. The terminology is becoming familiar and some of it is getting boring. I need some way to pep it up so I think I will graph it in blender as an animation using SciPy.

\begin{matrix}
\nabla\times\stackrel{\rightarrow}E
&&=&&
-\mu\frac{\partial\stackrel{\rightarrow}H}
{\partial t}\\

also\\

\nabla\times\stackrel{\rightarrow}H
&&=&
\sigma\stackrel{\rightarrow}E\ +
&\epsilon\frac{\partial\stackrel{\rightarrow}E}
{\partial t}\\
\end{matrix}

The LaTeX for Maxwell's Equations. Three constants mu, epsilon and sigma that are part of representing the vector differential of E and H with respect to change in time. Hmmm, I wonder what mu is? I could be enlightened by that. It seems to imply that the probability of vector H given vector E with v is 1. I am sure there is more to it than that and though it seems a good approximation, it fails to account for the infinities involved. Quantum mechanics is intended to fix that, but I feel there is a part missing. Space does get convolved in space and though the term is space-time continuum, that is a misnomer IMHO. What is in a name, whether i-hat or j-hat, it smells of imaginary space and hidden variables.

From what I have read, Maxwell had more fun with this stuff than people would have liked. It just wasn't Victorian enough. Maxwell's dæmon, now that is interesting.

Quantum dot analysis

Implementing a quantum dot interface in Python reference. Remember -msse3 in CFLAGS for splines. I have no idea how a template can have duplicate variables and compile?? FitF and FitU [int vorder, int vorder ] instead of [int vorder , int torder] IDK, stuff happens. Also #include <algorithm> in LDD.cc

Library paths are not well scoped also I think as problems with sprng.h with common.h . I will look into that if it fails to run or SIGSEGVs. Only so much time in a lifetime t<60*60*24*365*130 sec. (4*10⁹ seconds ) for sure .popen2.cc also stdlib.h for exit() Differences in <complex.h> and just <complex> PIMC ( Path Integral Monte Carlo ) is a long compile.

Gravity methods

The gravity management would require too much energy to implement for space , however it does lead to gravidar, which I am assuming has no way to be shielded from or deflected. I do believe that radar was kept secret for quite some time as it was not known how it worked. I am guessing this is the case here. Since there is no coherent theory of gravity and no means to even detect the largest of effects, it will remain unknown for some time.

I installed sage from source to get the latest version and deal with some problems with differential equations. It is a 4 hour build, but worth it. It has improved since the last time I used it.

As far as gravity, it seems that it would be much much easier than any neutrino communication and could be implemented very simply. It would allow an entire new band of unregulated communication that is probably far less problematic than radio waves and would not be susceptible to interference by solar flares, EMP or other electronic effects.

I do not post comments that serve as links to companies. Just sayin'

It seems that there is a better method to deal with and identify eigenvectors of a system. It is an interesting aspect of vectors and has taken some time to appreciate the full value. Markov chains is another very useful method.

Arrival Imminent(AI)

So now I have two patterns of energy that I can use to search data bases and I have the data bases and an interface. I wish Google had done this, it would have been a snap for them. Anyway, it seems to me that GRB was discovered because the US was trying to detect nuclear tests and there was a big "Day the Earth Stood Still" movie about how nuclear explosions would signal aliens to descend and warn us of our doom if we used such devices.
The premise is valid I would assume, but the trick of mixing unstable nuclei is hardly much more than making fire. If I can detect a signature of a FTL shift or the use of the G variation that I suspect is true in astronomical data bases, it would be an indicator of intelligent use of physics that allows travel at speeds that would be essential for inter solar navigation. I would say it would be a smoking gun and I would assume the counterpart would be true. If "someone" is monitoring space to determine if a new threat is appearing , it would certainly be FTL signatures and gravity transport. I can't say for certain, but it is science extrapolation at this point and not fiction. Psychologically I am reminded of a Star Trek TNG episode where "Q" mixes the Earth up with the Borg and it is reasonable to assume that the universe is not all fun and amusement parks. If other life exists, it is likely to be far advanced, just by the averages. I suspect that many scientists are well aware that we are approaching a boundary that would complicate human existence dramatically. 10¹⁸ more dimensions of possibility is a real sharp spike and some consideration of the position is warranted. It won't be long, I think.
I will be immersed in programming, testing, and scanning for some time and so I will likely not post unless something strange drops out of the data or process.
If I happen to find the coincidence of a signature of gravity manipulation and FTL in the same location, my only suggestion is "I for one welcome our new FTL overlords" . BTW, I misspelled the debian universe simulation package and it is "xorsa", not "xorca", big difference.

Gravitism

I think that I may have discovered a basis for manipulating gravity. It seems so obvious when it is discovered. That is the way with everything, confusion and chaos and then resolution. I can test it with the equipment that I have and determine whether I am wrong in my analysis. There was a specific topological form that has been rattling around for some time and it is so convolute that I needed some blender and Python tools just to get some little idea of the direction of resultant forces.

This looks very promising and so I will first search star data for a system that correlates and see if there is a data fit. Unexpected consequence. I had expected this to be a long process of elimination and that may yet be true.

It is very odd how things can be in plain sight and be missed for centuries. The mind is sometimes not the greatest scientific instrument. I was thinking of how to generate a gravitational relativistic potential and was deciding it was impossible without a massive black hole, and then it hit me. I sure hope this pans out. It would be the final piece of the puzzle, as genetics, nanomachines, control systems, inertia and energy are all usable. It would be nice to be free of this Third Rock from the Sun and actually go and see for myself what is present and how it can be used. I suppose it is some personal "wanderlust", but being confined to some small extent of an infinite universe makes me feel claustrophobic. Odd, Albert Infinity (AI) was born today. :)

Managing astronomical data

The use of cubeview in Linux seems to be working and NASA has made a real effort to make astronomical data accessible. In addition Google has made blogger easier to use and removed some of the rough edges for posting.

My intent was to get a verification of the equations that extend electromagnetic fields to gravitational fields and then to devise a method to enter and leave a gravity well with the least risk and expense. This will certainly be helpful. I am hoping that looking through the data will allow me to observe something new, determine how it is caused and thus consider what method could be applied to implement such an effect. Like watching birds and pondering flight. The universe is the best example of what is possible.

I can see some patterns in the systems of equations. The control of gravity or at least a more realistic up/down method for gravity wells is the only stumbling block. A momentum system is way too complicated and expensive to provide common access to space. There is a solution in the system, but it will require some more analytical tools.

This is definitely helpful and I look forward to seeing it integrated into kstars and I will implement it in blender.

I am making a γ ray burst 3D model in blender using spheres of different color and composition to allow me to place the GRBs in 3 space based on the z values and direction. Then I was going to do some least cubes analysis and graph paths analysis to see if there really is some hidden pattern in the data. I would assume that there are several explanations for sets of GRB data and thus I am planning to use object type labels to manipulate the information in groups. There are only 500 confirmed and detected GRBs at the present time so it is a very small data set, considering that the scope of the universe encompasses more than 10¹⁸ stars.

I have to wonder why the data is still maintained in some ancient Phoenician or Sumerian mariner like format. +34° 07' 23'' FOV 17.9° 13h 24m 34s +39° 40' 29''. It seems unnecessarily complex to express the position on a circle this way. Percentage of PI would seem more understandable in the first place. It is just a vector. <i,j,k>. I would prefer vector notation and perhaps I will just make some code to allow me to have that translated.

Analysis of Sagittarius A* in wavelength and dimension

But the sequestering of the data, even temporarily, has irritated other astronomers, who believe that it is antithetical to the ideal of scientific openness.

The quote is about the failure to release top candidate data on Earth like exoplanet locations. The question I must ask is whether they are using publicly funded data to create personal wealth in the form of fame and publishing? I suppose we could pass legislation to repeal Newton's laws and that would show them.

http://chandra.harvard.edu/photo/2001/0204flare/index.html

This "Science Users" portion of the Multiwavelength Milky Way Project is intended primarily for use by the astronomical community. As such, this page includes technical references and links to data sets not present on the Education pages. Presented here are maps of the Milky Way galaxy at ten wavelength regions. The maps are constrained to +/- ten degrees of the Galactic plane. Below the maps is a finder char

The files are not known to contain errors, but the user is advised to check any scientific results against the data from the original sources. The user is also referred to the original references for descriptions of backgrounds, sensitivities, resolutions, and other considerations relevant to the interpretation of the data.

cat Instrument.DAT | sed  "s/\o000/\n/g"

Above is typical "find and replace" using sed, the stream editor. It is necessary for some files in order to make the data readable by code and plot functions. That particular rune is a method to replace "binary zero" as a UNIX EOL ( End Of Line ).

Even though pitch roll and yaw fit well into the Cartesian system, I am certain that the ratio of X:Y, Y:Z , and Z:X contains redundant information. I suppose that I am obligated to plot it and correlate the three relationships to see if they are consistent and if they have a new degree of uncertainty as a result.

I assume it will be possible to determine, with some precision, the complete ( time and distance² distorted ) map of the universe. There seems to be no obstacle except the complexity of calculations. To make it more fun I will use a mirror ball in blender and place objects to simulate the distortions of a sphere as a gravity/charge induced bump map.That should also make it easier to manipulate the variations that would arise due to relativistic speed and gravitational red shift.

Actually the M104 ngc4594 "sombrero galaxy" could be easier to interpolate from the secondary glow as a general rule of thumb to the variations. Sag A* is occluded and is more difficult. I will try both and see if they correlate. Surprisingly the Sag A* is considered small at 4 million solar masses and a radius that would extend to about the orbit of Venus if it were in the center of the Sol system.

More raw data available

World Data Centers can be accessed to analyze raw data. I am searching for the raw x-ray data from the galactic center and creating a model to analyze the x-ray patterns and their relationship to the (1/r²)*mass*angle to surface variation correlation.

Conservation of charge and energy would predict that a sphere with an event horizon for neutrally charged matter would also have an event horizon for positive and negatively charged material and that this horizon would be distinct from the gravitational horizon. As a result there would be a zone of high magnetic field varying with the charge to mass ratio and the angular momentum of the object. It means that the surface of a black hole should produce some synchrotron like radiation that would be highly red shifted. It does seem reasonable that the frequency and distribution could be computed and folded in polar coordinates to project a half map of the universe as its effect reflects in the surface of the local galaxy black hole charged event horizon.

The all seeing eye of the dark star

It does seem reasonable that the event horizon of a black hole would reflect the gravitational image of the entire universe. It answers an interesting question that I had about a reference in some ancient texts. I will have to do some math, but I assume that it could have been worked out before. It seems a simple enough matter. If the surface of a black hole is the differential gravity at a point in space, then any effect at any distance in time and space would reflect upon it. Thus it is possible with existing data to observe the extent of the universe at T_n in the direction behind us. It also may solve another problem I was having with making sense of a particular sky survey.

I doesn't seem that it should be that simple, but the math works out correctly. I need to check my logic and figures on this.

Spider milk and the FungiiLichen

I have analyzed the possible inventions for space and it is possible to construct nearly all the tools and make a coherent system. It lacks one part and so I will focus on that. The transform from a 2D population to a 3D space population would seem to be a long and complicated path, but it seems to me that it is not centuries or years or even days away. If the appropriate relationship can be applied, it is very much like any exponential effect. In the 1700's it was the way west in the US and it was a period of 100 years. In the 1960's it was computers and it was virtually done in 10 years, Internet 5, DNA, AI, genetics, and more.

There is only one last equation that needs to be in place and that is the equivalent of the Maxwell equations that incorporate gravity. I can do all kinds of things with electro-magnetics like NAND, and communication and power. The extension of the EM equations is already in place in the form of various transforms and methods or constructors. So I will take what I have learned from multi-variable calculus, matrices, analysis and tools to identify that one key relationship that allows the design of gravity control systems. E is abundant if you know how to generate and collect it. Complexity is easy to implement now. It is that one single hole in the sphere, topologically speaking.

svn checkout http://ti-warrior.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/ ti-warrior-read-only

Somebody came up with the covered wagon, browser, rifle, car, dynamite, and many other things that allowed the extension of influence. If I were to sell a gravity vehicle with capabilities to travel to distant stars, it has the same effect. The life extends and grows in new places and when it finds a solution that allows expansion in a new way there is a period of exponentiation. It isn't that bizarre. So s^20 probably which is about s.2^67 and thus is 67 cycles. What is the cycle? , hard to compute. If I were offered a planet and solar system for myself, if I made the effort to go there, it would seem a reasonable thing to do. In the case of the internet browser netscape, I could get netscape, connect to a network and have access to the entire world. So by comparison, I download a gravity calculation, and have access to the universe. It is just another infinity and I have no idea what it would do to people and nobody does. It is just something that can be done and then it is done. People will try and control it and silly people will continue to buy what is free. Snake oil flows freely in all dimensions.

The larger and more complex a system is, the harder it is to achieve single point control. That is a simple fact of control theory. It is what generally keeps us from being eaten by the parasites that continually seek to be king of the universe. The eigenvectors of gravity, ...... perhaps.

Who is on the inside

The image is another example of x being used in a way that means something completely different. In this case it is the genetic "cross" of gene pairs, and don't even think about vector cross products. The rest of the image is using fluorescent markers to locate parts of a gene during meiosis.

I did some calculations and it seems to me that the inside of a black hole would be just like being in the universe. It would look distorted and in some way it seems that there would be some holes in the hole. Now that has to be more confusing than √-1.

Tred -lightly- on conservation of energy

Light is changed in direction and energy by its interaction with matter. Thus, matter is changed by its interaction with light. Conservation requires that light traveling with respect to mass must interact and that the interaction is conservative.

{Conservative system}
A material system of such a nature that after the system has undergone any series of changes, and been brought back in any manner to its original state, the whole work done by external agents on the system is equal to the whole work done by the system overcoming external forces.

--James Clerk Maxwell.      

So for the sake of argument, Total luminosity is inversely proportional to the distance squared and corresponding frequency or E is inversely proportional to √distance. And the absorption lines of specific distances will follow a line down the shifting frequencies and the &Sigma E:f would necessarily be cumulative.

It isn't an equation as such. I tried doing this in blender to see what it looked like and it bogged down too much. I can do it with a simple program that has sources and then computes the spectrum at a specific location.This is more like what I would expect from a scientific representation of the universe. Instead of saying that v and D are related by H_o, I can say that I have an algorithm that takes a three dimensional array of matter and spectral sources of specific class ( thus curve ) and applies a transform that represents the observed product at any given point.

It matters not whether it is called Hubble's constant or any other name. The procedure could be called foo() just as well, so long as the name is unique within the context and scope of the object or program.

The patent office has caved to the mighty power of Google's engine and even though Galaxy Zoo is a neat concept that would have been really catchy in the 60's, Now it is a testament to the temporal drift of NASA. Tang is not available any more and there is a reason for that. Give Google the data and let them give you an answer. The concept "find similar images" seems somewhat familiar to me.

I would rather look at the source of a program and offer a diff and patch to whoever is committing the changes and let the product call the winner. If the resultant is divergent over a small ( Haar-like ) section then it is discarded. It is open source science at its best. The sad part is that countries should have cooperated in this way 50 years ago and it takes a company like Google, software like GNU/Linux, and projects like Wikipedia to show what can be done when people cooperate and coordinate.

In a P2P environment, like BitTorrent or various other protocols, it is possible to assign a node of computation to every coordinating P2P address based on its computational capability. Like a Beowulf cluster. If a star is variable with period t and I am a node on a coordinated matrix, then the function light(x,y,z,time,freq){} is the data provided by my IP to a composite. Without having the capability to compute the entire universe, I could traverse a path and define one single element of that path and accumulate it at one central point. ArcSecond/FLOPs. It seems to me that partitioning space as 100.23.14.21:50 is very similar to x:y:z:t.f and if IPV6 is used it is x:y:z:t:a:b.f and can define a set of algorithms that modify the data. It is a TSP and factorial issue. Governments and companies do not want P2P as it makes it impossible to regulate, and this is a foreshadowing of the problem of government in 3 space. It is possible to color a map in 4 colors and execute a pincer movement in 2 dimensions, but in space the color theorem falls to disarray and pincer movements become oily ball bearing problems.