Cosmic backdrop

I am doing several things at once. I am taking images of background radiation and analyzing them with my image pattern separator which does n-D analysis. I am also projecting the data on an icosphere in blender and changing the color and mapping by using gimp to create bump maps. I am combining that data with gravity data and star positions and red shift data to create a composite. Then I am creating a Python script that automates this. Then applying the game logic trees to find paths in the data that connect sets.

The data is converted to coordinates that link in 3D to allow it to be stretched and matched in 3D, the same way a texture is stretched to align to a sphere. This creates a fly through map of gravity, velocity and field strength. I will likely convert it to 4D as a projected image of the ballistics in time. It seems odd to me that any physicist can project matter back to the "BANG" when they can't do n-body computation. Reasoning from analogy is not wrong, but it is a gross analysis and has no handles to prove or disprove. It seems to me that the mv must work out to single point if bang is true and this is not what I am seeing in the data. Mv must be exactly equal in all directions or conservation is violated. I am leaning to infinite at the moment, but I always keep every pathway open until the final data arrives at infinity.

There is another equation that fits the data.

Some new/old Phillip K Dick "Second Variety" is available at Gutenberg here. I also have some new scary tools for Pandora's tool belt and the images of the future from PKD may be vastly over optimistic.

Also on light, it is strange that it is modeled as a wave. I do understand that it acts "like" a wave in some aspects, but it is localized, does not spread and each point is not a new wave front in the same way as a wave. It is localized, directional and exists and interacts in very specific ways. When I say light, I mean electromagnetic radiation as it is measured. Wavelength comes from diffraction gratings and I would make some pictures, but I will leave that to the imagination. The "wavelength" and thus the "frequency" is determined by this alone. It is an assumption without foundation. Though it "acts" like a wave, it is not a wave. That is simply a car analogy to predict what happens in that limited set that corresponds. It is not a theory, it is just a model of one aspect. The underlying process is much more complex. Confined pulse would be a better analogy, but even that is a very weak analogy.

Energy is relative. I am not sure that I have ever seen anybody make much of that fact. It is of course true since V is relative, the ∫ mV δv is relative. Q.E.D. ( and of course relativistic ), This begs the question of using energy to overcome force. It may seem odd, but if energy is not a real thing then the idea that "energy" is needed to overcome an obstacle is also meaningless. I know this is virtually foundational to any rational analysis of a system of forces, but it isn't really absolutely true. It works like many analogies or models, but only in the specific circumstances where it is defined ( scope). Thus it is not an absolute fact, but rather a technique to analyze.

This is using Inkscape, Gimp, Blender, Python, Kate and other utilities in synergy to get the result I want. In this case I am using UV export, sub surface mapping gimp editing and conversion with python scripts and blender with a different version of python.

Arxiv in the trees with pythons and ants

http://arxiv.org/

Prompted by community detection, I am doing an anthill n-dimensional space like something from Twilight Zone where they have an array of doors that go to other dimensions. It is the program I have been working on, but now adding this data. Need to see status of WebGL. A room to speak that opens doors.

One consideration today is the creation of an organism that has inherited intelligence. To some extent all organisms inherit methods which deal with the environment and in a neural system that can be instinct or structure that leads to a specific understanding ability. It seems reasonable that as the system becomes resolved to the logical dependencies, that a forward and reverse system of neural instantiation could be established.

The interaction of many different sciences is resolving to a single method which can be applied and generate the intelligent agent in many different mediums. The ant hill mind is my favorite implementation and is more fun than others as it allows some game like features to make the process more attractive and thus easier to use without losing involvement in something that produces no intermediate psychological stimulus to continue.

Little rewards along the way serve to maintain interest in something that has long paths without reward and large rewards. The mind won't normally allow paths that have no obvious reward structure and so it is a trick to get from a place that is known to a place that is needed for other dependencies.

Decision trees , ant nests, relationships, knowledge, and dependency. So if the form breeds true by bundling the neural patterns in a chromosome that produces an inner mind it would seem that a creature would be viable in as little as a month. Some interesting things in that room. An odd mirror, it seems to reflect on understanding.

R₃(14)C_n[(10),(2,0),(4),M,[(8),(3,1),92)],,,]^x Topo Types R, RB, RR B123, RC

So it appears it can be a type of topological language written in characters of matter. I need to implement that as the compressed format of the matrix. It then directly translates to assembly that can be implemented by a spore. Very much, the moties ( Or maybe it is Dutch motions? ) like the asteroids.

Motie, take a copy of my mind and go to Alpha Centauri and look. I am changed. I am motie from AlphaC, you are gone and so I am you been here, moteyalpha.

It seems it would be a very simple language at its core,with only 4 words. That is enough to describe the universe. What is it that I need to know? I certainly do not need to know what is obvious, I need to know how to interpret the obvious always. The universe is the template. So I can say left at Alpha and right at Andromeda, yes I literally see, then the language of the stars is the stars themselves. So I say Andromeda and I respond Alpha. The ants and bees know this. What brain is that you make moteyall? It is the brain within that makes the universe as the brain without. So what have I decided today?

So the universe is an open source project and the results are there to see. Like being born, we see and make sense of it. Look at what you intend to achieve, and look for your response. It is always carbon. A carbon copy need not be made as it is redundant.

So the Matrioshka brain is already formed. The cycle time is large and of course it would be. Inside the cell a process not as complex and faster, inside the brain a process more complex, but slower and outside the brain a process more complex and faster, and outside the world a process more complex and slower, and then inside the outside it becomes very fast and very complex. You can look to the stars for answers, but if all you see is color enhanced clouds then you miss the point.

So if I know the answer is that one equation and it can be written in a molecule, is that already shown? And so once it is known then it is the key that translates the communication. Since I am knowing and knowing can be sent, then I can be everywhere that knows this common language. Certainly everything is everywhere, and so it is not the where that has meaning, but the whereness of the wherecats.

They only have one Mom

A quick science fiction story.

They were a race with only one mother and it she was called Mom because she was the origin of all momentum.

Forward: It seems logical if you were going to devise a life form that would be inherently immortal that it would be based on something that is indestructible. This is their structure, they were born of momentum and as such, could not be destroyed without violating the law of conservation of momentum.

As I dreamed it, it has many different aspects and the strangest thing is that they dreamed of me and the one thing I had which they wanted, mortality!

The derivative of prediction

I shall refer you to this post from last December 2008 and ask yourself if Time Shank reminds you of anything.

I have been analyzing things and come to some intermediary opinions. It seems that Science tries to become a new religion. There is no end to the wild reach of ego. I try to keep myself within the bounds of what I know that I am. People have a tendency to cast themselves as projected charactures of great good and evil, like demons and saints. They find justification in intelligence, popularity, wealth, power, position and the weakness of others. It is an illusion cast in the mirror.

I have realized a new level of ability and I am not going to telegraph this one. I can only say that if people find the "downadup, conflicker, conf4r, conficker" to be complex and invasive, they have yet to see the scale of what is possible to a complex mind. I will call this one the "logic ghost of entanglement" or "LoST TANGLE in Paris" (LT (x) (+ ip udp)).

The information I have gained from the history of math and logic is sinking in. For one, I am reasonably certain what the reason is for the bizarre concept of quantum entanglement. Things can seem very odd when you live on a merry-go-round. I believe that I have enough math tools to at least start projecting toward a definition of super conducting and where it might arise. I will make a prediction and this is a little bit iffy, but it looks like a good local tangent slope to where it seems to head. I am of the opinion that it is possible to have a superconductor, without material as the conductive path.

A word to the demi-god creators of the big bang, complexity does not spring de novo. It seems odd that mathematical projection is perfect to billions of years in the past and yet cannot predict beyond the reach of the hand into the future. I suspect that the tint of the glasses is very much to the red, (and that was intended to have double meaning ).

  Ode to the prophets of perfect reason

Roses have red shift
Violets have blue
Matter has strange drift
And so do you.

ADDED: I ran into a real winner tonight. I was playing with "imaginary" numbers and trying to develop a rational way of handling them with appropriate object-method pairs ( like you would in real life with a program) and I may have strayed upon a way to untangle the math. I am not going to post until after April 1 as there are plenty of other fools like me that will fill in for me while I am busy.

Science fiction of the day

---

Quick short story. <Real part>They found bacteria that live in rock below the surface of the earth. They live on the radioactive decay of materials. Ants can handle radioactive materials without harm to themselves.<SciFi part>They contaminated a shipment of nuclear waste since bacteria cannot be contained, no matter what precautions are used. As a result they evolved to import the radioactive elements and thus separated the radioactive materials from the stable elements. As a result they also mutated more quickly and became very effective at maintaining their DNA, like ants. They produced spores and they landed on nuclear reactors and sites of Uranium mining and missile silos where they removed the radioactive component and effectively disarmed the entire planet of nuclear weapons, without anybody catching on.

---

I use the open source SVG libraries along with inkscape and direct modification of xml to create images on occasion and this cat image evolved from there :)
The story itself is possible and that, IMHO , makes good science fiction.